Evangelistic Purity
.... "Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect."
(1 Corinthians 1:17)
.... As an example of a message that is mixed with worldly wisdom, you may have heard a mathematical approach to evangelism called ‘Pascal’s Wager’. Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) examined all the possible responses to the gospel and their consequences. Basically, he stated that if God really exists and you believe in Him, you win everything; but if He didn’t exist and you believed, you lose nothing. Therefore, running the odds as a Las Vegas style bet, the safest response was to believe in Him..... As one may readily see, ‘hedging our bets’ is anything but a faith response to the gospel, and the gospel is the power of God to salvation for the one who believes (Romans 1:16). In this example, the gospel has been mixed with worldly wisdom so it will be ineffective for the listener’s salvation. Even if they ‘bet on God’ they will remain unsaved:
.... "Therefore it is also contained in the Scripture, "Behold, I lay in Zion a chief cornerstone, elect, precious, and he who believes on Him will by no means be put to shame."'
(1 Peter 2:6)
.... Or perhaps you’ve heard similar logic through a popular catch-phrase: "He is no fool who gives up what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose." Clever sayings like these seem to offer the listener an intellectual appeal for believeing the gospel: .... "You should believe the gospel because it’s the ‘wise’ thing to do. Your friends won’t laugh at you that way. They’ll think you're really smart." But an intellectual response is not a faith response either, so a person responding intellectually will remain unsaved as well (1 Corinthians 1:18-25). And arguments based on ‘scientific support’ fall into a similar category.
.... Or perhaps an evangelist may preach the gospel, but at the same time he'll introduce the listener to Christian psychological counselling in order to address their personal problems. In so doing he may explain that "Sometimes these things take a while." But this whole approach betrays his lack of confidence that the gospel itself is able to address their woes:
.... "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new."
(2 Corinthians 5:17)
.... Either we believe that God transforms us through receiving Jesus Christ, or we don’t; either we believe Him or we’re calling Him a liar (1 John 5:10). Has God’s arm been shortened? Has He spoken, and He is not able to bring it to pass? Why then would we not trust Him to fulfill His word? Because faith is the response He requires, and this means we must believe with all of our heart (Hebrews 11:6; Romans 10:9). .... In each of those examples, an evangelist’s own doubt is being revealed. They are hedging their bets every bit as much as Paschal, but in the opposite direction. And in truth, deep inside, most of them are probably ashamed of the gospel. They are afraid that people will laugh at them for believing; they are ignorant of the true power that the gospel of Jesus Christ contains (1 Corinthians 1:18). Yet a true evangelist would answer them by saying:
.... "For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God to salvation for everyone who believes, for the Jew first and also for the Greek."
(Romans 1:16)
We will continue this discussion in our next lesson. To proceed to the next lesson, click here
Daily Bible Reading: Mark 12













1 Comments:
Here is another reason to understand the link between teachings and miracles. If God responded with miracles to a mixed message, like the ones we’ve described, it would be dangerously unclear what He was responding to. Could it be an endorsement of the human logic? What if the listener embraces that, instead of the gospel? Or what if that ‘scientific evidence’ later fell into disrepute?
God has sworn that the world, by it’s wisdom, will never know Him, so this approach would effectively lock them out of His kingdom instead of drawing them in. No, but rather, God will save us through the gospel alone. For when God's only Son was put to an open shame to save us, He will allow no other things to glory in His presence, to 'add' to what was done (1 Cor 1:21).
By
loren, at 6/23/2005 11:28 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home