Introduction to Faith and Grace
.... The church of today is characterized by many ‘denomi- nations’, which came into existence through a series of doctrinal disagreements (1 Corinthinas 11:19). So let’s take a moment and think about what that means:
.
.
.... Even though there are several ‘versions’ of the church, there are not several versions of the truth (Ephesians 4:21). If each denomination has a different belief on the same subject, they could all be wrong but they could not all be right. At most, only one such doctrine could prevail in each case (hint: it would be the one that points to Jesus - Ephesians 4:13-14). So this begs the very important question of just how much error our relationship with God could tolerate, and we would still be considered Christians? Or at what point would it be said that we’ve crossed that line, to be considered a cult?
.
... In the Scriptures, six subjects play an essential role in our doctrinal understanding. They are so vital, in fact, that we must understanding them purely in order to be saved. We don’t need to know much about them, but whatever we do know has to be correct. These subjects include our beliefs over the nature of God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit (and thus, between them, the doctrine of the Trinity,) as well as our basic understandings of faith, grace, and the gospel. Please refer to the chart, below:
... In the Scriptures, six subjects play an essential role in our doctrinal understanding. They are so vital, in fact, that we must understanding them purely in order to be saved. We don’t need to know much about them, but whatever we do know has to be correct. These subjects include our beliefs over the nature of God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit (and thus, between them, the doctrine of the Trinity,) as well as our basic understandings of faith, grace, and the gospel. Please refer to the chart, below:
....
A little thoughtfulness will illuminate the importance of these six areas. These are the doctrinal counterparts to our real, actual, living relationship with God, in it’s most basic terms; the ‘paperback’ understanding of the real thing! As such, a proper understanding in these areas will guide us into a pure relationship with God in actual, real life; but an error in one or more of these areas would have the effect of guiding us away from Him, resulting in estrangement (see Galatians 5:4).
.... Organizations that claim to be Christian, yet fail in one or more of those doctrinal areas, are referred to as cults. This would include groups like Jehovah Witnesses, the Mormons, and the Way International. Other groups, such as the Seventh Day Adventists, have significant doctrinal disagreements with the mainstream church yet those six vital areas of their doctrine remain sound. Since those other areas of difference are not enough to exclude them, they are still Christians and should not be considered a cult..
.... In the beginning of this course we discussed the gospel in several of our modules. In the days to come we’ll discuss the Doctrine of the Trinity as well, which describes the nature of the person of God. But in this module we’ll address the two remaining vital topics, faith and grace, and the role they play in our walk with the Lord as we hold them purely.
To proceed to the next lesson, click here
Daily Bible Reading: Romans 6














8 Comments:
How did I arrive at those six areas of doctrine, as being vital? The model I’ve provided should speak for itself, but the same thing can be established from the other direction, by looking at the bounds of doctrinal error:
Within the Scriptures, when someone is said to have fallen from grace, to have suffered shipwreck of the faith, to be estranged from Christ, or to have descended into a fallen spiritual state knows as ‘bondage’ (Gal 5:1), it is always in relation to a false teaching in one of those six areas. Or if someone is reprobate, it is because they have backslidden, which means they have received the grace of God in vain.
By
loren, at 10/25/2005 11:43 PM
In the world of cult apologetics, some experts consider Seventh Day Adventism to be a cult, and others do not. Officially, under the definition given here, they would not be considered a cult. However, there in a non-official tendency within many of it’s members to be overly concerned in keeping the ordinances of the law, and that is problematic.
The law contains many good lessons, chiefly in pointing us to the character of Christ; yet once this connection has been made we are to yield to His righteousness and relate to Him by faith (Gal 3:24). But when the law becomes an end in itself, for the purpose of seeking righteousness or justification before God (as occurred in the case of the Galatians), it would be used in a way that was never intended. Such a misapplication would clash with the gospel itself, making it an alternative, or substitute, to its claims. When used that sort of way, even the law would be considered ‘another gospel’ (Gal 1:6-8).
We will discuss the proper perspective on the law, later in this module.
By
loren, at 10/25/2005 11:44 PM
Thats a tough one in considering the Seventh Day Adventist. Had some friends that went with them. Not sure how I feel. Strong Legalism there. That issue of trusting in the Law or trusting Christ alone is big.
They don't have a cult founder do they. I'm not very familiar with them.
Can you give a short synopsis of their background?
By
Bhedr, at 10/26/2005 12:07 AM
Hi Brian,
Most of what I know about them came from the research of Dr. Walter Martin. His position was that they did have some significant doctrinal problems, and those problems are important in other ways, but the group should not be considered a cult.
I also think one needs to make a disctinction between the church stand and it's members personal stands. Officially the church does not believe in salvation by the law; but in practical terms many of its members are legalistic anyway. You put your finger on this one very deftly. This is their big area of concern, but it is more cultural than doctrinal within thier church setting (i.e. everyone else is doign it).
I don't remember off hand how they were founded.
By
loren, at 10/26/2005 12:34 AM
Hi Kurt,
Thank you for the link! Hey Brian, see below!
By
loren, at 10/26/2005 2:58 PM
Hi Loren,
I like your graphic. I think I saw Dr. Walter Martin one time on a show called the John Ankerberg show which is a show that I don't think is on anymore. I will be interested in reading you future posts on this "module". Thanks for all your thoughts on my blog.
Re: your new self (blogger profile picture): you can't turn back the clock even though you might want to!
By
Rose~, at 10/26/2005 8:53 PM
Thanks Loren will check out Kurts info.
By
Bhedr, at 10/26/2005 11:17 PM
Hi Rose,
Dr. Martin passed away several years ago, but he may have been on the Ankerberg show. I think pretty highly of Ankerberg too.
Oh, the picture. Ha ha! Happy Halloween! I'll change it back afterward (or maybe sooner, if I get too much kidding about it!)
By
loren, at 10/26/2005 11:17 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home