Refilled with the Spirit?

.... In our previous posting we discussed the infilling of the Holy Spirit, which is an actual manifestation of the presence of God in our lives. The Bible describes this infilling as boundless and continuous, for He will never leave us nor forsake us (see John 14:16-18). Nevertheless, some modern Christians believe that the 'anointing' will eventually run dry. Chiefly, this teaching is based on a two-pronged approach, beginning with Ephesians 5:18:

.... "And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit."
.
.... The original Greek in this passage implies a continuous sense, which may be better rendered as: ‘be ye being filled with the Spirit’. Therefore, some Christians believe that a continuous re-filling is envisioned. But with a proper understanding of the infilling itself, there is no conflict at all:
.
.... Think, for a moment, of the nozzle on a water fountain as it gushes forth. The nozzle is constantly filled, yet the water is overflowing as well. It never runs dry; it simply flows over. Now compare this to the description Jesus gave:

.... "He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water."

(John 7:38)

.... Christians who believe we must be ‘re-filled’ based the other leg of their doctrine on a perceived repetition of the event. They will note, quite correctly, that the apostles were filled with the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2:4). But two chapters later, as the believers were gathered together again, the Bible reads that "the place where they were assembled together was shaken; and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and they spoke the word of God with boldness." (Acts 4:31). And again much later, on a third occasion, as Peter and some of the other brethren were gathered in the house of Cornelius:

.... "the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word."

(Acts 10:44)

.... The Apostle Peter was present for each of those instances, so let’s use him as a microcosm. Based on these passages it has been argued that Peter and those with him were filled with the Holy Spirit on the first occasion, then ‘re-filled’ on the second and third occasions. This, of course, assumes they had ‘run dry’ in between those instances, but is that really the case?

.... "whoever takes a drink of the water that I will give him shall never, no never, be thirsty anymore. But the water that I give him shall become a spring of water welling up (flowing, bubbling) contunually within him unto (into, for) eternal life."

.... "For God does not give His Spirit sparingly or by measure, but boundless is the gift God makes of His Spirit."

(John 4:13-14; 3:34 - Amplified)

.... Let us consider. On the Day of Pentecost, in the early morning, one hundred and twenty Christians became Spirit-filled, including Peter himself (Acts 1:15; 2:4). But later that day, 3,000 additional persons believed and were added to the church (Acts 2:41). Peter did promise them that they would be baptized in the Holy Spirit as well (Acts 2:39), and the Bible records their baptism in water -- but it does not say that they were baptized with the Holy Spirit at this time.
.
.... Just as the apostles themselves had to wait until they were endued with power from on high (Acts 1:4-5), it is apparent that this new group of believers had to wait as well, until the events of Acts chapter 4 took place (the 'second occasion', that was referenced above). Since the church had begun with 120 spirit-filled believers and their numbers had grown to more than 3,000 by that time, it is evident that over 96% of the church members were still waited for this promise in their lives, which finally came to pass in Acts 4:31.
.
.... We will continue this discussion in the ‘comments’ section.

To proceed to the next lesson, click here

Daily Bible Reading: 2 Corinthians 1

4 Comments:

  • The ‘second’ instance in which the Holy Spirit fell upon believers is found in Acts 4:31. When the Bible says “they were all filled with Holy Spirit”, we must consider the context: for the Greek word for ‘all’ signifies a corporate whole. In other words, whereas ‘some’ of them were previously filled with the Holy Spirit, now it could be said that they were ‘all’ filled. The newer disciples simply joined the previous ones in being spirit filled; nothing in this passage implies that the original 120 were ‘re-filled’ on this occasion.

    By Blogger loren, at 12/01/2005 10:19 PM  

  • Likewise in the house of Cornelius, we know that Peter “preached the gospel . . . by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven.” (1 Pet 1:12). Peter demonstrates that he already had the power to be a witness for Jesus, so he was clearly filled with the Holy Spirit at the time (Acts 1:8). Therefore, when the Bible says that “the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word” it is referring, not to Peter nor the Jewish believers who accompanied him, but to the new Gentile believers. For at a later time, Peter would clarify this in saying:

    “And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them, as upon us at the beginning.”
    (Acts 11:15)

    By Blogger loren, at 12/01/2005 10:19 PM  

  • In the Old Testament days, when the Spirit of the Lord came upon someone, it was a different arrangement. The Spirit would come and go as the occasion called for it. The best examples were in the lives of Samson (Judg 14:6; 14:19; 15:14) or of Saul (1 Sam 10:10; 11:6). But the New Testament sense is different. Just as the Holy Spirit descended on Jesus and remained on Him (John 1:32), the Holy Spirit remains with us, and will never leave us nor forsake us:

    “And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever.”
    (John 14:16)

    So in the New Testament sense, rather than saying that the Spirit of the Lord ‘came upon them’, we see a different wording: “Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit. . .” or, “Paul, filled with the Holy Spirit . . .” (Acts 4:8; 13:9). It is evident that the Spirit was abiding in their lives already, and the Bible is merely reminding us that this was so. Therefore we conclude that the Baptism with the Holy Spirit is a gift that is irrevocable (Romans 11:29).

    Now, isn’t this good news? Isn’t this great to know? What a comfort and a joy! So why are some Christians so upset to hear about it? I’m afraid that, for a few of them at least, the answer is dubious. It is because, for them, their livelihood is involved in it being otherwise.

    To put it plainly, the actual baptism with the Holy Spirit is a dynamic, break-through event in a believer’s life. But if it only happens once and then remains, nothing that follows may ever seem to match it. Plus there is no particular reason why a new Christian, once filled, should feel bound to the same church he attended when this occurred. But on the other hand, if he believes he must be re-filled occasionally, he will be back because of this perceived need. He may also want to ‘relive the thrill’, and the person who ‘re-baptizes’ him each week will achieve a special importance in his life. Their story is very similar to that of Simon, in Acts chapter 8.

    I’m sorry if I sound cynical in this, because that’s not my intention. But as I mentioned earlier, this is a doctrine that touches on the Person of God, of just who He is and of what He is like, so it is imperative that untrue teachings be addressed. When we hear a teaching of this sort, of a spirit who is ‘different’ than the true Holy Spirit, yet is called by His name, it is evident that the enemy is behind the teaching (2 Cor 11:3,4). We’ll discuss his stratagems further in a future lesson.

    By Blogger loren, at 12/01/2005 10:20 PM  

  • great posting...very helpful. The water fountian example, superb, thanks again Loren.

    By Blogger anne, at 12/02/2005 12:54 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home